{smcl} {* 07 Sept 2005}{...} {hline} help for {hi:binscrn1} {right: (version 1.1.2) } {hline} {title:Summary screening measures for a test with binary outcome} {p 8 12}{cmd:binscrn1} {it:test_var} {it:disease_var} {ifin} [, {opt l:evel(#)} {opt f:ormat(%fmt)}] {title:Description} {pstd} {cmd:binscrn1} calculates true and false positive rates, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic likelihood ratios for binary test outcome data. {pstd} Positive and negative predictive values assume cohort data; i.e. that the proportion of disease positive observations in the dataset represents the population disease prevalence. {pstd} {it:test_var} is a 0/1 test outcome variable and {it:disease_var} is the 0/1 (disease) group indicator variable. {pstd}All screening measures are available as returned results after running the program: {col 8} TPF: r(tp) FPF: r(fp) {col 8} PPV: r(ppv) NPV: r(npv) {col 8} DLR+: r(dlrpos) DLR-: r(dlrneg) {col 8} disease prevalence: r(disprev) {pstd}along with confidence limits for TPF, FPF, PPV, NPV:{p_end} {col 6}eg. for TPF, {col 8}Clopper-Pearson: [r(tp_lb_ex),r(tp_ub_ex)] {col 8} Wilson: [r(tp_lb_wi),r(tp_ub_wi)] {col 8} logit: [r(tp_lb_lg),r(tp_ub_lg)] {pstd}and, {col 8} s.e.(ln(DLR+)): r(selndlrp) {col 8} s.e.(ln(DLR-)): r(selndlrn) {pstd} and the following joint confidence regions: {col 6} (TPF, FPF): r(tpj_lb),r(tpj_ub) x r(fpj_lb),r(fpj_ub) {col 6} (PPV, NPV): r(ppvj_lb),r(ppvj_ub) x r(npvj_lb),r(npvj_ub) {col 6}(DLR+,DLR-): r(dlrpj_lb),r(dlrpj_ub) x r(dlrnj_lb),r(dlrnj_ub) {title:Options} {phang} {opt level(#)}; see {help estimation options##level():estimation options}. {phang} {opt format(%fmt)} specifies the display {help format} for estimates and CI's. The default is %4.2g {title:Remarks} {pstd} originally written for Margaret Pepe's "Statistical Methods for Evaluating Medical Diagnostic Tests" course (Biostat 578) {pstd} Rectangular joint confidence regions (TP, FP) and (PPV, NPV) are based on on sqrt(1-alpha) level logit-based confidence limits for the component measures TP, FP, PPV, NPV. {pstd}Joint confidence regions for (DLR+, DLR-) are derived from the sqrt(1-alpha) level logit-based limits for TP and FP. {pstd}see {help binscrn2} for comparison of 2 screening tests (binary outcome) with unpaired data (independent samples) and {help binscrn3} for comparison of tests with paired data. {title:References} {pmore}Pepe MS. {browse "http://www.fhcrc.org/science/labs/pepe/book":The Statistical Evaluation of Medical Tests for Classification and Prediction.} Oxford University Press. Chapter 2. 2003. {break} {pstd}calculation of confidence intervals for DLR+ and DLR-: {pmore}Simel DL, Samsa GP, and Matchar DB. Likelihood ratios with confidence: sample size estimation for diagnostic test studies. J. of Clin. Epidem. 44(8):763-70, 1991. {pstd}Wilson confidence limits for binomial proportions: {pmore}Brown LD, Cai TT, DasGupta A. Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 16:101-133. 2001 {title:Examples} {phang} .use http://www.fhcrc.org/science/labs/pepe/book/data/est1, clear {p_end} {phang} .binscrn1 y1 d {p_end} {phang} .binscrn1 y2 d, level(90) format(%6.2g){p_end} {title:Author} {pstd}Gary Longton, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.{break} glongton@fhcrc.org